Blog / Crisis communications for outages, incidents and supply disruption

Crisis communications for outages, incidents and supply disruption

Richard Crighton
October 29, 2026

How an organisation handles a crisis or emergency response situation depends on the work it did before anything went wrong.

Most organisations have a crisis plan but fewer have people on call who know what they’re allowed to say, who approves what and where it gets published. Those that respond well have practised often enough that they don’t need to open the document.

This matters beyond the comms team. What a business says in those first few hours impacts whether customers stay – and what the board spends the following month explaining.

Speed beats polish in the first statement

A short, accurate holding statement in the first 30 to 60 minutes does more for trust than a fully worked-up statement three hours later. It only needs to say what’s confirmed and what’s being done about it. Silence in that window gets read as confusion, evasion or indifference, and people will choose the least flattering of the three.

Speed depends on sign-off. If a holding line requires multiple approvals before it goes out, the hour is gone. Agree the wording of holding statements in advance and give one senior person the authority to release them.

Say what you know, then what you don’t

Statements that stick to confirmed facts, and say plainly what’s still being established, survive scrutiny better than detailed ones.

‘We’re dealing with an incident affecting card payments in our stores and are working to establish the cause’ stays true whatever the cause turns out to be. A statement that guesses at cause, or plays down the scale before anyone knows it, will need correcting. Each correction costs more credibility than the original delay would have.

One source, updated on a schedule

When the press office and the call centre are working from different versions, they contradict each other, and the contradictions get reported long after the incident is fixed.

Pick one source of truth, usually a status page or the latest media statement, and point every other channel back to it. Then update it at set times, even when there’s nothing new. ‘No change, next update at 3pm’ reassures people. A page that hasn’t moved in two hours does the opposite.

Brief your own people before the public

Customers usually reach a call centre or a shop counter before they read a press statement. If the staff they meet haven’t been given the same facts and the same agreed wording, the story starts to fracture at the point of most direct contact. Send frontline teams the holding statement at the same moment it goes public, or before, with a clear line on what to say when they don’t know the answer.

Close the loop once it’s over

Restoring service doesn’t end the incident. Customers still need to hear what went wrong, what’s changing to stop it happening again and how to claim support or compensation. Skip that step and the last thing anyone read about you is the crisis.

This is also the point to judge how the response went. Coverage volume is a poor measure. Better benchmarks are whether customers stayed and whether the regulator had to ask for anything twice. Those answers belong in front of the board, alongside what to rehearse before next time.

When crisis communications work, they look calm from the outside. That’s because the difficult decisions, about who speaks and on what evidence, were taken months earlier by people who weren’t under pressure.

If you have a business problem you need help with, we’re here to talk – drop us a line at [email protected]

More Blogs

Rebuilding public trust in the NHS through honest communication

Rebuilding public trust in the NHS through honest communication

For the people running NHS trusts and health boards, trust...

View more

How energy leaders can become credible voices in the UK’s energy debate

How energy leaders can become credible voices in the UK’s energy debate

Ask an energy sector chief executive why they want a...

View more

Why the consumer should be the last one laughing, not the brand

Why the consumer should be the last one laughing, not the brand

Humour used in corporate and consumer communications can be an...

View more