When Rachel Reeves rose to deliver the Autumn Budget, she did so under intense pressure – from the public finances, the markets, the voters, and even her own party. We were told to expect a Budget with Labour values. What emerged was a budget that wears them proudly on its sleeve, raising medium-term taxes to their highest level since 1970 while boosting welfare support and projecting fiscal responsibility. But beneath the surface, it was a cautious, tightly managed package: reliant on tax rises, restrained on structural reform and carefully designed to reassure markets and voters alike.
Backbenchers nod while the City breathes a quiet sigh of relief
Within Labour ranks the mood seems one of muted approval. Scrapping the two‑child benefit cap and reversing planned welfare cuts will land well with many backbench MPs, especially those most concerned about child poverty and inequality. But it is not a budget of ambition or transformation. For many on the left it will feel incremental but not enough to project long‑term change.
Meanwhile, instead of panic, markets offered a sigh of relief. Early jitters caused by a bungled leak of economic forecasts from the Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR) were short‑lived. Sterling nudged up, 10‑year gilt yields dipped, and investors interpreted the package as broadly manageable.
The City favours predictability. In a year clouded by economic uncertainty, a Budget that avoided big surprises and kept debt markets calm was exactly the kind of stabilising anchor financial markets wanted.
The tightrope remains
However, stability comes at a price. Tax rises including frozen thresholds, higher levies on dividends and savings. Fresh property and wealth‑related charges risk angering middle‑income voters who already feel squeezed.
While the Budget may have reassured financial markets, several sectors were left absorbing fresh blows. For energy firms, the decision to keep the 78% windfall tax on North Sea profits has triggered sharp criticism from industry leaders, who argue the levy is no longer fit for purpose and is actively deterring investment at a time when long-term energy security and transition planning are paramount.
Elsewhere, consumer-facing industries also took a blow. Betting and gaming companies were hit by sharp rises in gambling duties, prompting an immediate drop in share prices for some of the UK’s biggest operators. Hospitality leaders and drinks producers warned that increased alcohol levies risk further eroding margins within a sector already grappling with cost pressures.
In effect, the Budget asked multiple sectors to shoulder more of the fiscal burden, without offering much in the way of regulatory certainty or structural support. While politically cautious, this spread of sector-specific pain may prove harder to manage in practice, particularly if affected industries begin to scale back investment or planned growth.
Political opportunities abound
The Conservatives were quick to accuse Labour of prioritising tax over growth, hoping to contrast it with promises of tax cuts and deregulation in a bid to shore up the party’s base with elections looming in May.
North of the border, the SNP seized on the Budget to push a familiar line: that Scotland’s needs are being sidelined. With Holyrood elections on the horizon, Scottish Labour must now defend a UK-wide fiscal strategy that could be painted as tone-deaf to local economic pressures.
Reform UK, meanwhile, continues to tap into frustration over the cost of living and squeezed household finances. For a party that positions itself as the voice of the disenchanted, the potential of rising taxes and a stagnant economy offers plenty of political oxygen.
Why this matters
Reeves’ budget has given her some breathing space. But it’s a delicate equilibrium. The lack of bold reform may avoid immediate backlash, but it also leaves questions hanging: where will future growth come from? What is the long-term plan for structurally strained sectors? And how long can higher taxes carry the political and economic load?
For now, the government appears to be banking on cautious management, political steadiness – and, quietly, on outperforming the Office for Budget Responsibility’s downbeat forecasts. If growth comes in stronger than expected, and inflation and interest rates continue to fall, Labour could head into the next election with better-than-expected economic tailwinds and some fiscal space to spare.
But that’s a big bet. And if the forecasts hold or worsen, this week’s tightrope will start to fray. The political risk of caution is that it only buys time – and that time will run out unless it delivers results.
Back to blog