With the clock ticking on climate targets and the net-zero horizon fast approaching, you might expect a cohesive national strategy guiding the UK’s energy transition. Instead, policy proposals, reversals and consultations, are arriving at the feet of the sector, often faster than the sector can absorb them.
For those building or financially backing renewable projects in the UK, the opportunity remains immense, but so does the uncertainty. The transition is no longer a question of ambition, but of execution. How it will be achieved? When will investment align with delivery? And where does the clarity and confidence needed to move at pace come from?
A flurry of reforms or a storm of confusion?
Over the past 12 months, UK energy policy has shifted so rapidly that even the most seasoned analysts are struggling to keep up. On one hand, you have sweeping proposals to reform the Contracts for Difference scheme, offering a more flexible, investor-friendly approach. Measures include longer contract durations and a broader eligibility net, all with the goal of accelerating renewables deployment. A new Planning and Infrastructure Bill promises to streamline approval processes, reducing the friction that has historically slowed large-scale renewables.
And then, on the other hand, the government is exploring zonal electricity pricing, one of the most contentious proposals currently under consideration. If progressed, this fundamental shift would mean different regions of the UK paying different prices based on local supply and demand. While intended to improve market efficiency and better reflect grid constraints, the move is drawing increasing criticism. A recent report from the UK Energy Research Centre warned that zonal pricing could increase consumer bills by up to £3 billion a year until the 2040s, rather than reduce them.1
Industry voices, including trade associations and unions, echo these concerns, warning that such a reform risks disincentivising renewable investment in Scotland, where energy generation is abundant, but demand is comparatively low. For developers and communities already contributing significantly to the UK’s clean energy supply, the message is unsettling: generate more but expect to earn less.
Some, meanwhile, argue that the change could in fact bring broader benefits. Octopus Energy, for example, supports zonal pricing, stating it would make the system more efficient and stop the waste of wind energy. According to their assessment, the best independent analysis shows it could save everyone billions on energy bills annually, foster economic growth, and give places like Scotland some of the cheapest energy bills in Europe.
In a sector where success depends on long-term planning and stability, inconsistency doesn’t just slow progress, it puts it at risk. If the UK is serious about leading the global energy transition, then consistency, not complexity, must guide the way forward.
A call for alignment
The opportunity in front of the UK is extraordinary. Across the country, there is potential to unlock hundreds of billions of pounds in renewable energy investment over the coming decade. But to unlock that scale, we need alignment between governments, departments, policy and practice.
The energy transition cannot be delivered piecemeal. It requires coherence, longevity, and strategic coordination. It means ensuring that taxation and investment policy work hand-in-hand. And it means trusting devolved administrations to deliver on their ambitions with the tools they need.
The verdict?
For all the government fanfare, the UK’s energy transition is starting to feel like a half-finished jigsaw. Pieces are flying in fast with new subsidies here and planning reforms there, but the picture isn’t coming together. The stakes are high, not just for Scotland with its world-class wind potential, but for the entire UK, which must deliver on climate commitments while securing energy resilience and economic renewal.
Right now, developers and investors face a landscape filled with opportunity, but also with caveats, contradictions, and calculated risk. Scotland wants to lead the UK into a greener future, but it can’t do it alone. Until there’s a coherent and coordinated national approach, the clean energy transition will remain a case of two steps forward, one uncertain step back. As the UK prepares to play a leading role in a global net-zero energy system, the single most valuable thing governments can offer is not new money or novel mechanisms, but something far more fundamental: clarity.
Back to blog